Cita Iniciado por dacres Ver mensaje
Al menos desde 1998, como indicaba el primer enlace del post #25.

Bueno, 1998. Entonces, si se encuentran artículos científicos anteriores que siguen manteniendo su validez y se han publicado con anterioridad a 1998, no habrán sido financiados por Enron ¿no?

Pues mira:

Este artículo del New York Times es de 1989:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...51C1A96F948260

y en él se recoge la presencia de un número sustancial de científicos escépticos con la teoría del calentamiento global antropogénico.

La declaración de Heidelberg, de 1992:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg_Appeal

Addressed to the chiefs of state and governments

Heidelberg, April 14, 1992

"We want to make our full contribution to the preservation of our common heritage, the Earth.

"We are, however, worried at the dawn of the twenty-first century, at the emergence of an irrational ideology which is opposed to scientific and industrial progress and impedes economic and social development.

"We contend that a Natural State, sometimes idealized by movements with a tendency to look towards the past, does not exist and has probably never existed since man's first appearance in the biosphere, insofar as humanity has always progressed by increasingly harnessing Nature to its needs and not the reverse.

"We fully subscribe to the objectives of a scientific ecology for a universe whose resources must be taken stock of, monitored and preserved. But we herewith demand that this stock-taking, monitoring and preservation be founded on scientific criteria and not on irrational pre-conceptions.

"We stress that many essential human activities are carried out either by manipulating hazardous substances or in their proximity, and that progress and development have always involved increasing control over hostile forces, to the benefit of mankind. We therefore consider that scientific ecology is no more than an extension of this continual progress toward the improved life of future generations. We intend to assert science's responsibility and duty towards society as a whole. We do however forewarn the authorities in charge of our planet's destiny against decisions which are supported by pseudo-scientific arguments or false and non-relevant data.

"We draw everybody's attention to the absolute necessity of helping poor countries attain a level of sustainable development which matches that of the rest of the planet, protecting them from troubles and dangers stemming from developed nations, and avoiding their entanglement in a web of unrealistic obligations which would compromise both their independence and their dignity.

"The greatest evils which stalk our Earth are ignorance and oppression, and not Science, Technology and Industry whose instruments, when adequately managed, are indispensable tools of a future shaped by Humanity, by itself and for itself, overcoming major problems like overpopulation, starvation and worldwide diseases."[
En otro sentido, represalias contra los que no comulgan con la teoría de cambio climático en boga:

http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1108742624.shtml

http://icanplainlysee.wordpress.com/...ters-punished/

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220

Y acabo con esta frase de un catedrático de ciencias de la atmósfera del MIT:

Alarm rather than genuine scientific curiosity, it appears, is essential to maintaining funding. And only the most senior scientists today can stand up against this alarmist gale, and defy the iron triangle of climate scientists, advocates and policymakers.
Parece que la alarma, en vez de la auténtica curiosidad científica es vital para mantener la financiación. Y sólo los científicos más prestigiosos de hoy en día puede resistir este vendaval alarmista y desafiar al triángulo de hierro que forman científicos, activistas y políticos del clima.


Por cierto, espero con ansiedad tu respuesta a la acusación de la implicación de Enron, empresa capitalista criminosa donde las hubiera, y justamente quebrada, en el protocolo de Kioto.