Ni a mi, ojalá dejaran el 3D en las TVs; estoy seguro que si no hubiera la "guerra de nits" que hay ahora lo dejarían, total daño no hace y tampoco encarece (antes si, hoy en día ya no) el producto. Pero bueno, se ve que no quieren impulsar más el formato y encaminarse hacia el HDR así que habrán visto que con la bajada progresiva de demanda de 3D es algo sin futuro y prefieren cesar el soporte ya.
Lo próximo es el HFR (no ha cuajado mucho las sesiones previas en USA, por no decir nada) y la realidad virtual (esto si tiene pinta de ser más hacia donde va a tirar la industria), junto al HDR+4K que eso ya es el presente claro.
Hay más datos de otros mercados pero tampoco quería llenar el hilo con gráficas. Y noticias todas las que queráis, de todas las corrientes políticas y países del mundo:
3D tech, but zero interest: TV manufacturers stop making set once hailed as future
3D TV is officially dead, but a band of fanatics won't let go | Fox News
Permitidme comentar el titular de este segundo, yo creo que le viene como un guante a alguno de por aquí:
3D TV is officially dead, but a band of fanatics won't let go (fuente, literalmente: 3D TV is officially dead, but a band of fanatics won't let go | Fox News)
http://www.businessinsider.com/3d-tv-is-dead-2017-1
Este último lo analiza muy bien, viene a explicar con palabras los datos que puse más arriba:
Causas del fracaso del formato en opinión del redactor:Here's a great example: 3D TV, which is officially dead. There are no more major TV-makers that make 3D TVs anymore.
LG and Sony follow other TV-makers — including Vizio, Sharp, and TCL — that removed 3D technology from their product lines.
In 2010, shortly after the success of "Avatar," the first 3D blockbuster, TV companies started throwing their entire engineering and marketing might behind the 3D tech. But ultimately, seven years later, "3D capability was never really universally embraced in the industry for home use, and it's just not a key buying factor when selecting a new TV," an LG product director told CNET.
Now the TV industry is focusing on 4K, HDR, and smart-TV features as ways to entice buyers to upgrade their sets. In 2012, 3D TVs accounted for 23% of all dollars spent on TVs, according to the NPD Group.
Today, 3D TV is used in the industry as a shorthand warning to those backing buzzy technologies like virtual reality, augmented reality, and wearables: Even if everyone is doing it doesn't mean it will catch on with consumers.
Más noticias con el mismo titular:- Not enough content. DirecTV and ESPN stopped broadcasting their 3D channels in 2012 and 2013.
- The glasses needed for 3D were clunky and annoying, and they made people feel self-conscious while wearing them.
- 3D TVs were and are perfectly good 2D TVs, so 3D features weren't often used.
- 3D movies were closely associated with Blu-ray Discs as movie streaming started to gain traction.
- 3D TVs need careful calibration and can cause eye strain.
- Maybe it was always a gimmick. Ask yourself: Have 3D effects ever really impressed you or affected your viewing experience.
https://www.cnet.com/news/shambling-...lls-down-dead/
3D TV is dead | The Independent
3D TV is officially dead: Sony and LG to drop support for 3D movies and TV shows this year - Mirror Online
https://entertainment.slashdot.org/s.../3d-tv-is-dead
https://www.lifehacker.com.au/2017/0...ad-and-buried/
http://english.etnews.com/20160205200002
Hasta flatspanel y AVSForums:
http://www.avsforum.com/3d-for-tv-is-dead/
CES 2017 trends: 3D is dead, curved TVs are dying - FlatpanelsHD
Luego tenéis la retirada de contenido 3D de Canal+ (Francia), ESPN, Sky (UK), los canales de cable (USA), Movistar+ (España) y en casi todo el mundo...
Vamos precisamente datos no faltan. No ha terminado de cuajar y no pasa nada (salvo la pasta que nos hemos dejado, ahí tengo la Pana con 4 gafas activas que costaron un pastizal cogiendo polvo), no hace falta negar la evidencia pero bueno.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Citar