Duda conexión equipo home cinema mejor hdmi? Óptica?

Iniciado por ManuelBC

No, no me cabe.
Estoy sopesando comprar las Silver FX y el central C350 y darle ami hija mi central y mis Bronze FX pero de hueco de central en el mueble tengo 22 cm y mide 23 cm.
Seguiré con el C150 ... hasta que algún día cambie el mueble o migre de Silver a otras.

Me refería a él lo de situar el central encima del mueble.
Cuando ponga el av lo más seguro es que o cambie el mueble o le haga alguna modificación y es posible que también cambie el central por el C350.

Según Audio Science Review, Marantz es un Denon degradado. Esta opinión se basa en los resultados de sus pruebas de laboratorio.

Conclusions
Like clockwork, the performance of Marantz SR7015 tracks other Marantz AVRs we have tested. They take the excellent platform used in Denon sister products and modify them to produce objectively worse performance by good bit. Distortion is sharply increased and extremely slow DAC filtering causes lots of ultrasonic noise, making any intention of playing "high-res" audio moot. Company feels subjectively the modifications improve the sound of the unit. With no controlled listening test demonstrating that, and measurements showing the opposite, I don't think the changes are wise or merited.

Needless to say, I can't recommend the Marantz SR7015. I highly suggest you stick with the Denon counterparts instead.

Pues bueno saberlo, yo estaba abierto a cualquier marca de momento pero ya si me dices eso, es verdad que sobre todo veo mucha gente con denom y Yamaha. Supongo que tendré elegir el que me entre en presupuesto y tenga disponibilidad ( suponiendo qué la decisión esté solamente entre decidir entre denom o yamaha)
Y sobre tema altavoces, veo que muchos usan Bower Winkins, son recomendables no? Alguna otra marca aconsejable?
Supongo que lo mejor para no equivocarme es elegir de misma marca los altavoces que el AVR
Siempre cuidando que mande suficientes vatios, amperios y la impedancia requerida

Iniciado por leider66

Y sobre tema altavoces, veo que muchos usan Bower Winkins, son recomendables no? ¿Alguna otra marca aconsejable?
Supongo que lo mejor para no equivocarme es elegir de misma marca los altavoces que el AVR
Siempre cuidando que mande suficientes vatios, amperios y la impedancia requerida

Siempre en Audio Science Review encontré esta prueba de los BW 607 S2 Anniversary Edition

Conclusions
Video marketing material only talks about improvements in drivers. That seems to be there. Alas, decades of research into what makes a good sounding speaker was ignored with poor integration of drivers, multiple resonances and poor directivity which result in "proper showroom" sound but nothing you would want to live with. I don't mind throwing a filter or two at a speaker to make it sound good. But this design needs way more than that. You have to become a speaker designer, doing the work that the company was supposed to do. And that ain't right.

I can see how some subjectivist reviewer would fall in love with the clean and low distortion highs and call it an audiophile experience with micro detail, imagine and usual buzzwords. But that is not a good diet for an audiophile. You want a speaker that gets out of the way and reproduces what is in your source faithfully.

Just to make sure I was not in a "bad audio mood," I swapped the 607 S2 for a Revel M105. Wow, what an improvement in overall tonality, feel of the speaker and quality all around. Yes, it costs twice as much. But it shows you what proper sound is like. It does justice to your music whereas the 607 S2 doesn't. It latter spits on your music and says, I am going to tell you how it should sound.

Is the 607 S2 the worse speaker I have heard? No. There is some good engineering in the driver. I hope some of that rubs off to whoever did the system design of the speaker.

The marketing material said they have sold one or two million 600 series speakers since inception. So I suspect the management if it sees this review is going to be flippant and continue to ship subpar speakers to their customers. It is a bit depressing that what sells is dominant factor in speaker business and design.

Needless to say, I can't recommend the B&W 607 S2 Anniversary Edition. There are plenty of speakers at low prices that do better.

B&W 805s

conclusions
a veteran high-end audio dealer once told me that the only two brands of speakers worth selling were martin logan and b&w. Both would draw customers to your door rather than you looking for them. The iconic look of the b&w shows why that is the case. Design wise though, this is a clearly flawed execution. Who would wish to have the frequencies in 1 to 4 khz screwed up and recessed in their speakers??? While not so obvious when you just listen to them, correct them with eq and you don't want to listen to them without it.

There is a feeling of quality to the speaker that saved it from getting a "headless panther" rating. Bass and dynamic performance is quite good. And the highest -- despite being excessive -- seemed clean.

Personally i would want a speaker to be much more perfect than this so can't recommend the b&w 805s.