SONY ZD9 series (FALD Backlight Master Drive)

La verdad es que en esos videos que pillan medio de lado sale bastante bien parada...
creo que es un ángulo de visión con el que me podría conformar...

Iniciado por comoquenohaypan

La verdad es que en esos videos que pillan medio de lado sale bastante bien parada...
creo que es un ángulo de visión con el que me podría conformar...

Sale bien parada porque hay luz , no obstante si estuvieras a oscuras, es cuándo puede empezar la fiesta .

Que puta bestialidad de brillo al 100%: 810 nits

Eso de noche no lo puedes poner o te quedas ciego

tendrán que tener algún sistema de seguridad que baje la luz de fondo y el contraste si se estropea el HDR de golpe...

Habrá que avisar a la compañía eléctrica de la "chupada" de luz que tiene el TV porque el HDR ha provocado un apagón .

Iniciado por Capitanmorcilla

Que puta bestialidad de brillo al 100%: 810 nits

Eso de noche no lo puedes poner o te quedas ciego

Iniciado por comoquenohaypan

tendrán que tener algún sistema de seguridad que baje la luz de fondo y el contraste si se estropea el HDR de golpe...

Mediciones:

Grayscale


Luminance vs. Area


ColorChecker


Saturation Sweeps (BT.2020)


Saturation Sweeps (DCI-P3 inside of BT.2020)


Gamut Coverage - DCI-P3


Gamut Coverage - BT.2020


Spectrum


http://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.ph...&postcount=181

Edit: En resumen: se queda con un brillo máximo de casi 2000 nits, pero calibrada está entorno los 1622 nits, las zonas de atenuación que posee no se mojan mucho y anuncian que es 35x18 y el tiempo de respuesta en modo Juego es de 45 ms. Es una pantalla de referencia a tener en cuenta pero que dependiendo de la unidad que te toque pueda tener más o menos DSE y que fuera de su eje, está claro que canta mucho la iluminación residual que pueda dejar.

A ver si es verdad que es la primera de "referencia".

Impresiones de otro propietario:

Some initial impressions of the tv, from the first few hours:

Like
-The covers on the back, routing the cables down the centre channel. No more HDMI mess hanging out of the side of my tv.
-HDR. I may have to eat some humble pie, because it looks like peak brightness DOES matter.
-iPlayer video playback is silky smooth (on the EF950 it's choppy as hell).
-Youtube plays "proper" 4k.
-The Youtube app is smoother to use and aesthetically pleasing.
-Motion is good. I've never had a problem with motion on the OLED, so read into that what you will, but all -I've done so far is turn on True Cinema on MotionFlow - which if I remember correctly from the W905 days was what was needed for blu ray playback and effectively off when not fed a 24p source.
-No obvious fade out at the edges, from either side of my sofa.
-Bright, punchy image when sat on my sofa.
-Not DSE.
-3D is pretty much perfect with regards to crosstalk.
-No sign of dark corners.

Dislike
-Android TV.
-It's very slow to respond (slower than the EF950, and almost as laggy as webOS was on the EC930).
-The menus are hardly intuitive, and video playback stops in some apps when you go to change the picture settings.
-The remote is crap, I keep pressing the wrong buttons (that last bit may be more me than the tv though!).
-The lack of a pointer makes it a chore to operate.
-Cluttered, ugly home screen full of crap I don't want.
-Seemingly unable to play 4K/HDR over DLNA without major stuttering (may be my setup, I need to do some testing).
-Off axis (when I walk into the room and round the tv) it does look like an LCD, with skin tones going that weird oil slick pink/green.
-The covers on the back are a bit of a faff to get back off when you realise you've stuck the HDMI cables into the wrong sockets.
-Every time I switch to the Panny blu-ray player the tv is going to another input (HDMI 4) for some reason I've yet to figure out.

The sun will be going down shortly and I'll start recording some videos if anyone's interested. I'm thinking it'll be good to pitch the OLED and Sony against each other in the apps that I can get close to parity with; Amazon and Netflix, with HD, UHD and HDR content.

Opening titles of the first episode of Marco Polo, Zd9 vs EF950:

Se comenta esto después del vídeo de revisión anterior:

ZD9 > KS9800: Higher brightness, higher colour brightness, a little bit more efficient, a lot more dimming zones (less halo effects), very natural colour mapping out of the box, smooth gradation very effective against banding artifacts from weak source material, supports 3D (but not in a good way) etc.

KS9800>ZD9: Better gaming mode, almost no visible trailing artifacts, HDR+ mode produces excellent bright details even with reduced backlight setting, higher colour gamut, samsung optimizes the picture more aggressively, which can be a good and bad thing, depending on the content, overall picture quality very comparable to the ZD9 but much better sound