Hombre estas son palabras del susodicho en un hilo que abri hara una semana en AVforums Jon Weaver se llama el guiri
original (pagina1)My view on this is that for normal viewing its impossible to see the difference between 720 and 1080!
I am sure that this will spark a debate, but I can only go on what I was able to test in my own home, by comparing 2 Panasonic 50" screens (G10 and X10).
If you are interested, you can read about it here:
Anyone want me to do some comparison tests between the G10 and X10?
What I found was that for a moving image, it was impossible to see a difference.. I tried PS3 games (selecting those which run in 1080P), Sky and Blueray..
I then paused given frames and scrutinized them and could see an only slight improvement of 1080 over 720, but it was very slight.. WHen looking at individual frames, I chose those which had background detail (such as small writing) and in truth, in my tests the difference was tiny.
When the image was moving, I can honestly say that it was impossible to tell the difference...
I also did this test at a viewing distance of between 10ft and 3" and again, could not see a significant difference.
The only think which did show a difference was a calibration HD Resolution test card (AVSHD).. With this, it was clear that the 1080 screen gave more resolution.. But it does.. There is no doubting that, so a 'test card' would show it.. But as I said, under 'normal' viewing conditions I could not tell the difference.
So in the end I stuck with an HD-Ready (768) screen and saved £300 and I will live with this until another major revolution comes along (i.e 3D).
Personally, I couldn't be happier with my choice.... I just wish that others were willing to turn their back on 1080 and snap up the X10 which gives a remarkable picture costs less than £600 for the 50" model.
Jon
http://www.avforums.com/forums/telev...overrated.html
Original del guiri
http://www.avforums.com/forums/plasm...n-g10-x10.html
La 42X20 disponible en 72 horas en electroprecio a 499 €![]()
Buenas tardes, he leido este post con mucha atención por que tengo intención de comprarme una G20 de 42... pero tengo una duda. Tengo un salón orientado al sur con dos ventanales, o sea, muchisima luz, cuando no llueve ;-), ¿se verá bien en esas condiciones el plasma o debo optar por un lcd?
Muchas gracias a todos.
yo vivo en un duodecimo;(echadle 30 metros sobre nivel del suelo como poco) orientación sur sin nada delante y con una ventana hasta el suelo obviamente de 210alto por 180 de largo. Ah! y no tengo cortinas en ninguna habitación de la casa xq para verme mas grande q un tapón de una botella (en proporcion xd) los de enfrente tiene q usar como poco prismaticos ya ya tengo persianas xd.
Nunca he tenido un plasma pero ahora voya poner uno. Espero tener menso reflejos q la piramide dle louvre xd
habra q levantarse a las 3 de la mañana para ver los mkv XD
Pero aqui hace muchos dias que se dice que la SD se ve mejor en una HDready que en una HDfull citando precisamente ese hilo...
Y en ese mismo hilo (pag7) se desmiente totalmente eso:Y teniendo en cuenta que los modelos FullHD suelen tener mejores paneles, electronica, opciones y prestaciones...SD Performance
And my conclusion? Well.. Frankly Its the same.. REALLY the same.. Identical infact.. I studied loads and loads of SD channels, recordings, DVDs and I can't see any difference between them. I tried to be scientific and looks for areas where I could measure the sharpness and detail, but I can't see ANY difference at all.![]()
Última edición por xavi11; 24/02/2010 a las 02:18
ese hilo es un embrollo, yo en su dia me lei gran parte de el y tienes a peña diciendo que se ven mejor los SD en un hdready y otros tanto que dicen que se ven igual en hdready como en fullhd ...
hay un pavo que dice que para escalar de SD a 720p, las HDready lo que hacen es escalar de SD a 1080p y luego de 1080p a 720p, o sea, lo flipas ...
ya no sabes a quien hacer caso