A estas alturas del hilo estoy de acuerdo en parte de tu escrito y reconozco parte de mi error, ya que los 24hz en sí no son los que provocan esa imagen artificial poca fluida que tanto me molesta (aumentarlo con frames nuevos como proponía creará otros artefactos)... pero también es cierto que 24fps en 24 Hz tampoco dan una imagen similar a como ve el ojo humano (que sigo insistiendo son una aberración).

Necesitamos mayor refresco y el multiplicar los frames para que los tiempos en los que persista la imagen negra sean menores (que al fin de cuentas es un efecto similar al que crean ciertas TV y proyectores con según que modo de la FI: no todos los modos de FI crean frames intermedios)... o similar a la obturación x3 cada vez más utilizada en el cine.


The human eye and its brain interface, the human visual system, can process 10 to 12 separate images per second, perceiving them individually,[1] but the threshold of perception is more complex, with different stimuli having different thresholds: the average shortest noticeable dark period, such as the flicker of a cathode ray tube monitor or fluorescent lamp, is 16 milliseconds,[2] while single-millisecond visual stimulus may have a perceived duration between 100ms and 400ms due to persistence of vision in the visual cortex. This may cause images perceived in this duration to appear as one stimulus, such as a 10ms green flash of light immediately followed by a 10ms red flash of light perceived as a single yellow flash of light.[3] Persistence of vision may also create an illusion of continuity, allowing a sequence of still images to give the impression of motion. Early silent films had a frame rate from 14 to 24 FPS which was enough for the sense of motion, but it was perceived as jerky motion. By using projectors with dual- and triple-blade shutters the rate was multiplied two or three times as seen by the audience. Thomas Edison said that 46 frames per second was the minimum: "anything less will strain the eye."[4][5] In the mid- to late-1920s, the frame rate for silent films increased to between 20 and 26 FPS.[4]
Frame rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Y aún así, parece que sigue sin haber unanimidad en el criterio :

72p is a progressive format and is currently in experimental stages. Major institutions such as Snell have demonstrated 720p72 pictures as a result of earlier analogue experiments, where 768 line television at 75 FPS looked subjectively better than 1150 line 50 FPS progressive pictures with higher shutter speeds available (and a corresponding lower data rate).[14] Modern cameras such as the Red One can use this frame rate to produce slow motion replays at 24 FPS. Douglas Trumbull, who undertook experiments with different frame rates that led to the Showscan film format, found that emotional impact peaked at 72 FPS for viewers.[citation needed] 72 FPS is the maximum rate available in the WMV video file format.

120p (120.00 Hz exactly) is a progressive format and is standardized for UHDTV by the ITU-R BT.2020 recommendation. It will be the single global "double-precision" frame rate for UHDTV (instead of using 100 Hz for PAL-based countries and 119.88 Hz for NTSC-based countries).
Frame rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quizás algo se nos escape...

Un saludete