Cita Iniciado por petatester Ver mensaje
A mi me da igual como lo graben, mientras no se carguen la "experiencia de ver cine".
Cuando quiera ver movimientos imposibles ultra-nítidos, me pondré un videojuego.
Lo que está claro que a cada uno nos molesta más un tipo de artefacto diferente. Yo no puedo con un 24Hz a pelo, porque el movimeinto me parece una aberración impoportable que tampoco se parece en nada a lo qe percibo en el mundo real.


Volvemos a un bucle sin salida... pues, y qué prefierte cada uno?:

How many frames per second can the human eye see?

Además de volver de nuevo al mensaje #16 de este hilo:


72p is a progressive format and is currently in experimental stages. Major institutions such as Snell have demonstrated 720p72 pictures as a result of earlier analogue experiments, where 768 line television at 75 FPS looked subjectively better than 1150 line 50 FPS progressive pictures with higher shutter speeds available (and a corresponding lower data rate).

The human eye and its brain interface, the human visual system, can process 10 to 12 separate images per second, perceiving them individually,[1] but the threshold of perception is more complex, with different stimuli having different thresholds: the average shortest noticeable dark period, such as the flicker of a cathode ray tube monitor or fluorescent lamp, is 16 milliseconds,[2] while single-millisecond visual stimulus may have a perceived duration between 100ms and 400ms due to persistence of vision in the visual cortex. This may cause images perceived in this duration to appear as one stimulus, such as a 10ms green flash of light immediately followed by a 10ms red flash of light perceived as a single yellow flash of light.[3] Persistence of vision may also create an illusion of continuity, allowing a sequence of still images to give the impression of motion. Early silent films had a frame rate from 14 to 24 FPS which was enough for the sense of motion, but it was perceived as jerky motion. By using projectors with dual- and triple-blade shutters the rate was multiplied two or three times as seen by the audience. Thomas Edison said that 46 frames per second was the minimum: "anything less will strain the eye."[4][5] In the mid- to late-1920s, the frame rate for silent films increased to between 20 and 26 FPS.[4]
Frame rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Personalmnete lo que busco es ver cine con un movimiewnto lo más parecido a como en la vida real veo moverse cualquier objeto en movimiento. No quiero tragarme un movimiento antinatural porque sea el estandard que se creó hace una eternidad.

"El problema" es que de momento no veo solución ideal en el tema y sólo unos pros y contras que cada cual elegirá según le molesta más ciertos artefactos.


Un saludete